Look at the footage
We take a sample before quoting, because an hour of organised material and an hour of unsorted cards are different jobs and it is unfair to price them the same.
Videography · Editing and repurposing · Sydney
Most businesses are sitting on more usable footage than they think: a shoot from two years ago, a webinar nobody clipped, an event that was filmed and never cut. Editing is the cheapest video you will ever commission, because the expensive part already happened.
Grab the snowball. Give it a spin, and watch it grow as you scroll. Just like your archive.
The short answer
Video editing services take footage that already exists and turn it into finished pieces: a hero cut, short clips for social, captioned versions, quote cards and stills. Repurposing is the same work applied deliberately, cutting one recording into many pieces rather than one.
It is the cheapest video available to any business, because the shoot has already been paid for. An hour of footage from a webinar, an event, a set of interviews or an old brand shoot will usually yield ten to sixteen short clips, a hero cut and a set of stills, which is a month of publishing without anyone standing in front of a camera.
We edit to a brief rather than to taste, deciding what each piece has to do from the same analytics behind our search work. Because our Snowball SEO platform automates the search heavy lifting other agencies bill by the hour, more of your budget goes into the work itself. It sits inside our wider Sydney video production service.
The difference
Worth understanding, because it explains why some changes are quick and free and others are effectively a new job. An edit is not one thing. It is five separate tracks that happen to play at the same time.
That last one is worth saying plainly: bad audio cannot be fixed in an edit, only improved. It is the one problem that has to be solved with a microphone on the day.
The cost
How much footage there is, how organised it is, and how many finished pieces come out. An hour of well labelled material and an hour of unsorted cards are not the same job.
Single edit
One finished video from footage you already have, with captions and the cuts around it. The commonest brief and the quickest to price.
One to many
A webinar, event or interview set cut into everything it can yield: short clips, quote cards, stills, a hero piece and a subtitled full version.
Retainer
A standing arrangement for teams filming their own material, so footage becomes finished pieces every month instead of accumulating on a drive.
We quote a fixed price per piece or per batch after looking at a sample of the footage, because the state of the material matters more than its length. For indicative Australian ranges, see our guide to video editing and repurposing.
The first two lines account for most of the difference between two quotes on the same footage.
Two clients send an hour of footage from the same kind of event. One sends labelled files, a transcript and a note saying which three moments matter. The other sends four unsorted memory cards.
The second job costs meaningfully more and it is nobody's fault, because the first hours are spent finding out what is on the cards rather than editing. None of that time produces anything you can watch.
So the cheapest thing you can do before sending footage is to name the files, supply any transcript you already have, and write three lines about what you want out of it. That is genuinely most of the saving available.
The scope
Priced by finished pieces rather than by hours, so you know what you are getting before the work starts.
Edited, colour corrected and mixed, in the formats your site, player and platforms accept rather than one master and a shrug.
Clips at nine by sixteen and one by one with captions burned in, which is where most of the value in repurposing actually sits.
Burned in where a platform needs it and as separate files where it does not, so another language later is a translation rather than a rebuild.
Frames pulled and graded, and the good lines set as cards, because a sentence someone actually said outperforms a written one.
Of everything usable, which makes the footage searchable for you afterwards and is the single most useful by-product of any edit.
Yours on request, labelled, so a future change does not depend on one supplier still having the drive and the software.
The return
More than most people expect, and in a very different order. The piece everyone asks for first is usually the one that produces the least.
Before commissioning anything new, it is worth an hour to find out what you already have. Most businesses that think they need a shoot actually need someone to open the folder from eighteen months ago.
A recorded webinar is ten clips. A set of event interviews is a year of proof. An old brand shoot has cutaways that make this year's video possible. None of it is as good as new footage, and all of it is available this week.
That is the same argument we make about written work in our content repurposing guide: make it once, publish it many times, and stop paying to produce the same thing twice.
The process
One to three weeks depending on how much footage there is and what state it arrives in. The review step is deliberately once, not continuously.
We take a sample before quoting, because an hour of organised material and an hour of unsorted cards are different jobs and it is unfair to price them the same.
What finished pieces you want, in what formats and lengths. Priced per piece, so nothing is discovered at delivery.
Everything transcribed and the usable moments marked, which is where a good edit is actually decided and the fastest way to work through a lot of footage.
The picture cut and the argument, without polish, so you comment on the substance before anyone spends time on the finish.
Consolidated, from everyone who has an opinion, in one pass. Sequential rounds from different people are how a two week edit becomes a two month one.
Grade, sound, captions and graphics, then every version and cut, named for where each one is going, with the transcript and files handed over.
The brief
Editing is bought on trust more than any other video service, because you cannot see the result until it exists. These four questions make it concrete.
A list of finished pieces with formats and lengths, priced per piece. Anything vaguer than that becomes a conversation at delivery, and you will be the one compromising.
Ask the number and what counts as a round. Unlimited usually means the editor has priced for a fight; one or two clearly defined rounds usually means they have not.
It should be included and it is the most useful thing you will get. It makes the footage searchable forever, and it is what lets anyone find a moment without scrubbing.
Ask before the work starts. Without them, every future change goes back through one supplier, and a caption fix becomes a negotiation.
We are happy to answer all four and to look at a sample before you commit. For the wider picture, see our guide to video editing and repurposing.
Start here
Send us a sample and tell us what you wish you had. The free consult is a working session, not a sales call, and you leave with three things whether or not you book us.
Good questions
Taking footage that already exists and turning it into finished pieces: a hero cut, short vertical and square clips with captions, subtitle files, quote cards, stills pulled from the footage, and a transcript. Repurposing is the same work applied deliberately, cutting one recording into many pieces rather than one.
We do not publish a single figure and we quote per finished piece rather than per hour. What moves it most is not the length of the footage but the state it arrives in: labelled files with a transcript are a far quicker job than unsorted cards. We look at a sample before quoting for exactly that reason.
Usually ten to sixteen short clips, plus eight to twelve quote cards or stills, a hero cut and a subtitled full version. It depends far more on what was said than on how it was filmed, which is why we transcribe first and cut second.
We can improve it, and we cannot fix it. Noise reduction, levelling and de-essing all help, but audio recorded from too far away in a live room stays recognisably poor. It is the one problem that has to be solved with a microphone on the day rather than afterwards.
The footage, any transcript you already have, and three lines on what you want out of it. Naming the files and flagging which moments matter is genuinely most of the saving available on any edit.
One consolidated round after the first cut, collected from everyone with an opinion at the same time. Sequential notes from different people arriving over three weeks is how a short edit becomes a long one, and we would rather agree that up front.
On request, labelled and handed over. We think you should ask this of anyone, because without the source project every future change has to go back through the same supplier at whatever they decide to charge.
Yes, and it is most of what this service is. We ask for a sample first to check the audio, the resolution and whether the coverage supports what you want, and we tell you before you commit if the honest answer is that it does not.