Topic and demand
What the piece is for and whether anyone is actually looking for it. If the honest answer is nobody, we say so before it is written rather than after.
Articles and written content · SEO articles and blogs · Sydney
Most business blogs fail the same way: they publish what the business finds interesting rather than what its buyers are searching for, and the two overlap far less than anyone expects. The writing is rarely the problem.
Grab the snowball. Give it a spin, and watch it grow as you scroll. Just like your authority.
The short answer
SEO article writing is producing articles built from what people actually search and ask, structured so both a reader and a search engine can find the answer quickly. It works when a set of articles covers one theme properly and links together, and it fails when individual posts are published in isolation and quietly compete with each other.
The part most often skipped is deciding what not to write. A business has far more expertise than it has demand, and a page answering a question nobody asks will never be read no matter how well it is written. The choosing is worth more than the drafting.
We build the topic map from real search and question data using the same research behind our search work, then write it with named authors rather than anonymously. Because our Snowball SEO platform automates the search heavy lifting other agencies bill by the hour, more of your budget goes into the writing. It sits inside our wider content writing service.
The difference
This is the question that decides whether a content programme works, and it is usually answered by whoever shouts loudest in the meeting. It should be answered by data you already have access to.
On how the structure works rather than how it is bought, our guide to topical authority sets out the pillar and cluster model in full.
The cost
Research depth and who does the writing, far more than word count. A thousand words that required three interviews and a data pull is a different job from a thousand words assembled from what is already on page one.
One piece
One researched, written and edited article with its internal links and schema. Useful as a trial, and the most expensive way to buy per piece.
One pillar plus clusters
The whole theme covered: a pillar page and the articles beneath it, planned together and linked, which is the smallest unit that actually behaves like a programme.
Monthly
A steady cadence with quarterly refreshes of what is already published, because existing pages usually have more upside than new ones.
We quote per piece or per cluster after a free consult and a look at what you already have. For the national picture, see our guide to content writing services.
Word count is on this list but it is nowhere near the top, which surprises most people buying content for the first time.
Most businesses with an existing blog have more to gain from fixing twenty published pieces than from adding four new ones, and it costs considerably less.
Pages that already rank on page two move with an update, a better answer near the top and a few internal links. A brand new page starts from nothing and has to earn its way past everything already there.
So the first thing we look at is what you have already published, and we will say so if the honest answer is that your budget is better spent there than on us writing more.
The scope
Written, edited and ready to publish, with the parts that make it findable included rather than quoted separately.
Researched, written and edited by a person, with a named author and a real profile behind the byline rather than an anonymous admin account.
Written to be clicked rather than stuffed, with a heading outline that lets a reader or an assistant find the answer without reading the whole piece.
The question answered in the first paragraph, in a form that stands alone if it is quoted somewhere else, which is increasingly where readers meet it first.
Links out to the pieces and services it should reach, and links added from existing pages back to it, because a new article nothing points at is invisible.
Article schema with the properties that are actually used, and FAQ markup only where the questions genuinely appear on the page.
What would date first and roughly when, so the piece gets updated on purpose rather than quietly going stale.
The return
One article rarely wins anything on its own. What wins is a set of them covering a theme completely enough that both a reader and a search engine conclude you are the place to find out about it.
Nine articles covering one theme completely will out-perform thirty covering nine themes shallowly, and cost less to produce. It is the least intuitive thing about content and the most reliable.
The reason is simple enough. A search engine has to decide who is authoritative on a subject, and a site with one thorough treatment of a theme is easier to be confident about than a site with one post about everything.
So we finish a theme before starting the next one, which is also how our own Knowledge Hub is built: clusters completed, then the next cluster started.
The process
Two to three weeks for a first piece, faster once a theme is running, and one point where you approve the outline before anyone writes prose.
What the piece is for and whether anyone is actually looking for it. If the honest answer is nobody, we say so before it is written rather than after.
Every heading, the answer to each, and the sources. You approve this, and it is the cheapest possible moment to disagree about what the piece says.
Sources gathered, and a short conversation with whoever in your business actually knows the subject, because that is what makes a piece worth reading.
Written by a person to the approved outline, with the answer near the top rather than held back for a conclusion nobody reaches.
A second pair of eyes on the argument and on every claim, with sources kept so a figure can be traced later.
Published with its schema, linked from the existing pages that should point at it, and noted for the next refresh.
The brief
Content is the easiest service to buy badly, because everything looks similar in a proposal and the difference only shows up six months later.
The answer should reference demand data and your sales conversations. If the topic list arrived without either, you are paying someone to guess in a document.
Ask whether a person writes it, who they are, and whose name goes on it. Anonymous content with no author behind it is harder to trust and increasingly harder to rank.
If you already publish, the honest answer for the first few months is often to refresh rather than add. A supplier who never suggests that is selling volume.
Internal links from existing pages, and a plan for refreshing. An article published and then abandoned is a cost, not an asset.
We are happy to answer all four and to look at what you already have before you commit. On what makes content citable, see content that ranks and gets cited.
Start here
Tell us who you sell to and what they keep asking. The free consult is a working session, not a sales call, and you leave with three things whether or not you book us.
Good questions
SEO article writing is producing articles built from what people actually search and ask, structured so a reader or a search engine can find the answer quickly. It works when a set of articles covers one theme completely and links together, and it fails when individual posts are published in isolation and compete with each other.
We do not publish a single figure and we quote per piece or per cluster. What moves the number is how much original research it needs, whether the writer has to learn a technical subject properly, whether it carries original data, how many bespoke figures it needs, and how many people hold a veto in review. Word count matters least.
Fewer than most people are sold. Nine pieces covering one theme completely will out-perform thirty covering nine themes shallowly, and cost less. The useful unit is a finished theme, not a monthly quota.
People write them, and we use tools for research, structure and checking rather than for the prose. Content that reads as machine-assembled does not hold a reader or earn a citation, and it is the easiest thing in the world for a buyer to spot.
For most businesses with an existing blog, refreshing wins for the first few months and costs less. A piece already sitting on page two moves with a better answer near the top and a few internal links. A brand new page starts from nothing.
As long as the question needs and no longer. Length is a consequence of the subject, not a target, and padding a piece to hit a word count is visible to a reader within two paragraphs.
It matters more each year. We publish under a named author with a real profile rather than an anonymous account, because both readers and search engines increasingly want to know who is making the claim.
Realistically three to six months before a new piece settles, longer in a competitive subject, and faster for refreshed pages that already have some standing. Anyone promising results in weeks is describing a different, shorter-lived thing.