Articles and written content · Editing and content refresh · Sydney

Content refresh and editing

Most businesses with a few years of published content are sitting on more upside in what they already have than in anything they could write next month. It is also the least exciting thing to buy, which is why almost nobody does it.

Grab the snowball. Give it a spin, and watch it grow as you scroll. Just like your archive.

3possible fates for any page
1audit before anything is touched
Often deletethe answer nobody wants to hear
Cheaperthan writing the same thing again

The short answer

What is a content refresh, and why does it beat publishing?

A content refresh is updating pages you have already published so they are true, complete and competitive again. It usually outperforms writing new pages because an existing page has standing, links and history that a new one has to earn from nothing.

The work is not only rewriting. Every page has three possible fates: fix it, merge it into a better page and redirect, or delete it. Deciding which is most of the value, and delete is the answer more often than anyone expects or wants.

We audit first and recommend honestly, including when the recommendation is a smaller job than you asked us to quote for. It sits inside our wider content writing service, and because our Snowball SEO platform automates the search heavy lifting other agencies bill by the hour, more of your budget goes into the work itself.

The difference

Fix it, merge it, or delete it?

Three fates, and the decision is made from data rather than sentiment. The page somebody spent a fortnight on four years ago has no special claim.

How to decide what happens to each pageA grid of four page situations against three possible actions. A page with traffic and a unique topic should be fixed. A page with traffic that duplicates another should be merged. A page with no traffic but a real topic can be fixed or merged. A page with no traffic and no unique topic should be deleted.Fix itMerge itDelete itTraffic, unique topicTraffic, duplicates anotherNo traffic, real topicNo traffic, no topic
The bottom row is the uncomfortable one and it is usually the largest. Pages with no traffic and nothing unique to say are a cost: they dilute the site and consume crawl attention that better pages need.

Signs a page should be fixed

  • It ranks on page two, which means it is close and something small is missing
  • The facts, figures or rules in it have changed
  • It answers a real question but buries the answer
  • It has links pointing at it, which are worth preserving

Signs it should be merged or deleted

  • Three other pages on your site cover the same ground more thoroughly
  • Nobody has visited it in a year and its topic has no demand
  • It was written for an old positioning the business has moved past
  • It exists because somebody once said the blog needed weekly posts

Where merging is the answer, that usually means building a pillar page and redirecting the thin pages into it.

The cost

What drives the price of a refresh?

How many pages, and how much of the work is judgement rather than typing. The audit is a fixed piece of thinking; the fixing scales with what it finds.

An audit

Assessment only

Every page assessed against traffic, links, accuracy and overlap, with a fix, merge or delete recommendation for each. Useful on its own.

Priority fixes

The top slice

The pages closest to a return: page-two rankings, out-of-date facts, and anything with links pointing at it that is currently underperforming.

Consolidation

Merge and redirect

Thin overlapping pages merged into stronger ones with the redirects handled properly, which is where the largest gains usually sit.

We quote the audit as a fixed piece and the work by band once we know what is there. See content repurposing for the related argument about reuse.

What moves the number, in order

  • How many pages exist, which is usually more than anyone believes
  • How much of the content is factually out of date rather than merely old
  • How much overlap there is, since merging is slower than fixing
  • Whether redirects and internal links have to be reworked
  • Whether figures and diagrams need remaking as well as words
  • How much of the original source material still exists

The audit is worth buying on its own

Even if you never commission a single fix, knowing which of your pages are working, which are duplicating each other and which should not exist is worth having. It changes what you publish next, which is the more expensive decision.

It is also the honest way to sell this. We would rather tell you that forty of your pages should be deleted and eight are worth fixing than quote to rewrite all forty-eight.

That recommendation has cost us work before, and it is still the right one, because a rewritten page nobody needed is a cost dressed up as an asset.

The scope

What you receive

An assessment you can act on without us, and then whichever work you choose.

The page-by-page audit

Every page with traffic, links, accuracy and overlap assessed, and one recommendation each: fix, merge or delete.

The rewrites

Fixed pages: facts updated, answer moved to the top, structure repaired, with what changed recorded.

Merge and redirect plans

Which pages fold into which, and the redirects written out so nothing is lost when the old URLs go.

Fact and claim checks

Every figure, rule and date verified against a current source, which is the part that most often turns out to matter.

Internal link repair

Links from your existing pages pointed at whatever survives, since a merge with no link updates loses most of its benefit.

A refresh calendar

What to revisit and when, so this becomes a habit rather than a project you do once every four years.

The return

How much of a site is usually worth keeping?

Less than people expect, and the number is not a criticism. Sites accumulate pages the way drawers accumulate cables, and nobody notices until somebody counts.

The usual shape of an established content libraryA ring divided into three parts. A small share of pages are working and should be kept and fixed. A larger share duplicate each other and should be merged. The largest share have no traffic and nothing unique to say and should be removed.Under a thirdof pages usually earn their placeWorking, fix theseOverlapping, mergeNot earning, remove
The proportions vary, and the shape rarely does. This is the picture in most content libraries older than about three years, and it is the reason an audit changes the plan more often than it confirms it.

Deleting is not losing

The objection is always the same: somebody paid for those pages. That money is already spent, and keeping a page that nothing links to and nobody reads does not recover any of it.

What deletion buys is a site where the good pages are easier to find, both for readers and for a crawler deciding how much of your site is worth its time. On a site that already struggles to get indexed, that is not a small thing.

Where a page has links pointing at it, we redirect rather than delete, so whatever standing it earned goes somewhere useful instead of nowhere.

The process

How a refresh runs

Two to three weeks for the audit, then work in priority bands.

Step 1

Inventory

Every published page listed, which is the step that surprises people, because the count is nearly always higher than the CMS suggests.

Step 2

Assess

Traffic, links, accuracy and overlap for each, turned into one recommendation per page.

Step 3

Agree the fates

Fix, merge or delete, decided together. This is the conversation where the value is, and it is worth having properly.

Step 4

Fix the priority band

The pages closest to a return first: page-two rankings, out-of-date facts, and anything with links pointing at it.

Step 5

Merge and redirect

Thin pages folded into stronger ones, redirects in place, internal links repointed.

Step 6

Set the calendar

What to revisit and when, so the library does not silently rot again over the next four years.

The brief

What to ask before you commission a refresh

This is the one content service where the honest answer often reduces the size of the job, which is a useful thing to test for.

Will you recommend deleting anything?

If the answer is no, you are being sold a rewrite of everything. A real audit always finds pages that should go.

How will you decide what to fix first?

Pages on page two, pages with out-of-date facts, and pages with links pointing at them. Anything else is starting from the wrong end.

Who handles the redirects?

Merging without redirects loses whatever the old pages had earned. Ask specifically who does it and how it is checked afterwards.

What happens to our internal links?

A merge that leaves fifty internal links pointing at deleted pages has undone most of its own benefit. It should be in the scope, not an afterthought.

We are happy to answer all four, and the audit stands on its own if you would rather act on it yourself. See topical authority for the structure worth consolidating towards.

Start here

Ready to find out what you already have?

Send us your sitemap and we will tell you honestly what is working. The free consult is a working session, not a sales call, and you leave with three things whether or not you book us.

  • A first read on how many of your pages are genuinely earning their place
  • The pages closest to a return, named, so you could act on them without us
  • A fixed price for the audit, and a banded price for whatever it finds
Get your free content audit

Good questions

Content refresh and editing FAQs

What is a content refresh?

It is updating pages you have already published so they are true, complete and competitive again. It usually outperforms writing new pages, because an existing page has standing, links and history that a new page has to earn from nothing.

How much does a content refresh cost?

The audit is a fixed piece of work and the fixes are quoted by band once we know what is there. What moves it is how many pages exist, how much is factually out of date, how much overlap there is, and whether redirects and internal links need reworking.

Should we really delete pages?

Often, yes, and it is the recommendation people resist most. A page nothing links to and nobody reads is not a neutral asset: it dilutes the site and consumes crawl attention that better pages need. Where a page has links, we redirect rather than delete.

How do you decide what to fix first?

Pages sitting on page two, because something small is usually missing. Pages with facts, figures or rules that have changed. And anything with links pointing at it that is underperforming, because that standing is already paid for.

How often should content be refreshed?

Anything with figures, prices or rules in it at least yearly. Evergreen explanations every two to three years. The useful habit is a calendar rather than a project done once every four years when somebody notices.

Will this hurt our rankings?

Done carelessly it can, which is why redirects and internal links are part of the work rather than an afterthought. Done properly, consolidating thin overlapping pages into stronger ones is one of the more reliable improvements available.

Can we just buy the audit?

Yes, and plenty of clients should. Knowing which pages work, which duplicate each other and which should not exist changes what you publish next, which is the more expensive decision.

What if we disagree with the recommendations?

Then we talk it through, and sometimes you are right: a page can be worth keeping for reasons that do not show up in traffic data, such as a sales team that sends it every week. The audit informs the decision rather than making it.